موسسه دانش بنیان ابتکار اندیشان عصر جدید شمار ثبت 46099

Arizona Cash Advance Reform, Proposition 200 (2008)

وبلاگ و اخبار

Arizona Cash Advance Reform, Proposition 200 (2008)


  • 1 Election results
  • 2 Text of this effort
  • 3 Back Ground
  • 4 information on the proposition
  • 5 Supporters
    • 5.1 Supporting arguments
    • 5.2 Donors to Proposition 200
  • 6 Opposition
    • 6.1 Opposing arguments
  • 7 Aftermath
  • 8 way to the ballot
    • 8.1 Ballot name lawsuit
  • 9 See also
  • 10 links that are external
    • 10.1 Basic information
    • 10.2 Supporters
    • 10.3 Opponents
  • 11 Footnotes
Arizona Constitution
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 6.1 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17 • 18 • 19 • 20 • 21 • 22 • 25 • 26 • 27 • 28 • 29 • 30

Arizona Proposition 200, also referred to as the cash advance Reform Act, ended up being in the November ballot in Arizona as a citizen-initiated amendment that is constitutional. It had been beaten.

The payday-loan effort had been mainly supported by the payday-loan company into the continuing state, and had been less strict compared to the avoid payday advances Initiative, sponsored by Rep. Marion McClure, D-30, and Sen. Debbie McCune Davis, D-14. That measure ended up being withdrawn during the early June if not sufficient signatures had been being gathered to qualify it for the ballot. 1

Election results

Arizona Payday Loan Reform
Result Votes Percentage
d No 1,271,717 59.6per cent
Yes 860,607 40.4%

Text associated with the effort

The 100-word description filed with all the Arizona Secretary of State’s office with this initiated state statute checks out:

Arizonans use payday lending services every day to meet up unexpected costs and financial emergencies. The payday financing industry is defined become eradicated additionally the Arizona Legislature will not enact reforms to profit borrowers while preserving this crucial monetary choice. This measure will bring dramatic reform that is pro-consumer payday lending and protect customer option. It offers a rate that is substantial, removes rolling-over principal to extend that loan, creates a payment plan free of charge to clients that can not fulfill their responsibilities, and inhibits a debtor’s capacity to get one or more loan at any given time. 3 4


The lending that is payday ended up being an $85 billion industry providing you with short-term loans, that have been often secured by having a check postdated to your debtor’s next payday. The attention price within the lack of legislation had typically worked off to on average $15 per $100 lent on a two-week loan. The high interest levels had been just what had resulted in legislative tries to manage the industry. The training had been unlawful in fifteen states in the right time of Proposition 200. In 2008, as well as Prop 200, Ohioans voted on payday lending in Ohio Issue 5. In Ohio and Arizona together, the true quantity of payday-lending branches outnumbers the Starbucks and McDonald’s outlets combined. 5

Information on the proposition

Under this proposition:

  • The payday-loan industry, which faces reduction this season when an enabling law expires, will have its straight to exercise within the state stretched indefinitely.
  • Charges payday loan providers are permitted to cost would drop from $17.65 to $15 for a $100, two-week loan.
  • Loan providers wouldn’t be allowed to move within the principal into extended loans and will have to provide customers payment plans.


“Arizonans for Financial Reform” was supporting this effort. It had been filed in reaction to your avoid payday advances Initiative, which will eradicate all pay day loans.

In line with the internet site of some other support that is affiliated, “Reform Arizona payday advances,” 6 , a huge number of Arizonans usage pay day loans responsibly to pay for unanticipated day-to-day costs. But, the website warns, the avoid payday advances Initiative would eliminate this easy option that is financial Arizona. Supporters of the measure argued that eliminating loans that are payday would harm many families financially, through higher banking fees, charge card belated charges, and energy reconnect fees. 6

Stan Barnes, a lobbyist and consultant to Americans for Financial Reform, a committee funded because of the payday-loan industry, supported this measure and stated the presssing problem boils down to customer option.

“Payday-lending shops occur because clients into the world that is real logical choices about borrowing cash short-term, plus in numerous instances, pay day loans would be the most affordable selection for some people that have a crisis or unexpected expense they should cope with,” Barnes stated.

Supporters included that closing all pay day loans in Arizona would also expel a lot more than 2,500 Arizona jobs. 6

Supporting arguments

Main arguments submit to get Proposition 200 included:

  • Prop. 200 would mandate a cut that is substantial loan charges
  • Establishes a repayment plan that is flexible
  • Needs internet loan providers to be certified within the state
  • Enacts tough new regulations to split straight down on unscrupulous operators
  • “About 5 per cent of Us americans took down an online payday loan. There is scant proof that their great deal might have been better if rejected that possibility. A report by two economists utilizing the ny Federal Reserve Bank unearthed that after Georgia and new york abolished payday financing, bounced checks and Chapter 7 bankruptcies increased.” 7

Donors to Proposition 200

Because of the end of July, supporters of Prop. 200 had offered about $8.7 million up to a campaign committee arranged to market the effort. The Arizona Republic stated that “nearly every cent. happens to be donated by – guess who? – a trade team representing lenders that are payday the Arizona Community Financial solutions Association.” 8


The website No On 200 : It really is No Reform At All had been created in opposition to the effort.

Rep. Marian McClure (R-Tucson), chairwoman for the avoid Payday Loans Initiative campaign, stated that cash advance reform, similar to this cash advance Reform Act]], is nothing but “window dressing.” 9

The Democratic Party of Arizona endorsed the Stop payday advances effort and argued that pay day loans are “by definition predatory and make money from economically vulnerable Arizona families by trapping them in unending rounds of financial obligation.”

Opposing arguments

Main arguments proposed versus Proposition 200 included:

  • Prop. 200 does not lengthen the minimum loan term of five times, hence maintaining loan that is payday at 391% APR or worse
  • Electronic use of debtor accounts offers payday lenders unfettered debit access to consumer bank reports and facilitates overcharging
  • The payment plan supply limits customers’ straight to request a payment intend to when per 12 months.
  • “The argument that closing loan that is payday will be a blow towards the economy is similarly spurious. It could assist the economy whenever we legalized the purchase of heroin and allow merchants hawk it from the road, but it doesn’t suggest it can make our everyday lives much better. A market that thrives on keeping customers bad will not assist the economy.” 10


Pay check loan providers would not disappear completely therefore effortlessly after the measure’s beat, because they amscot loans flex loan attempted to persuade lawmakers to allow them remain in company through the autumn of 2009. In accordance with reports, the industry hired state that is former General give Woods to represent them inside their efforts. In accordance with Woods, after studying a proposition by the industry, he was convinced there is destination when you look at the state of payday loan providers. 11

Way to the ballot

On June 23, its supporters switched much more than 265,000 signatures into the Arizona Secretary of State.

Ballot name lawsuit

Arizonans for Responsible Lending filed a lawsuit throughout the ballot language. Based on the lawsuit, voters might unknowingly accept a limit of 400 % rates of interest for pay day loans in the event that Secretary of State failed to explain the language that is descriptive of 200 from the November’s ballot.

Superior Court Judge Sam Myers ruled Aug. 27, 2008, that Secretary of State Janice Brewer didn’t have to explain the language. Judge Myers stated that the description of this ballot measure drafted by Secretary Brewer ended up being theoretically accurate, and therefore with just 50 terms to spell out issues that are complex alternatives need to be made.

دیدگاهتان را بنویسید

نشانی ایمیل شما منتشر نخواهد شد. بخش‌های موردنیاز علامت‌گذاری شده‌اند *

لورم ایپسوم یا طرح‌ نما به متنی آزمایشی و بی‌معنی در صنعت چاپ، صفحه‌آرایی و طراحی گرافیک گفته می‌شود.